Ferrotec vs Sumitomo Metal Mining
Sumitomo Metal Mining is larger by market cap ($16.4B vs $3.0B). Sumitomo Metal Mining reports higher tracked revenue ($11.0B vs $1.8B). Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Sumitomo Metal Mining's is Packaging Materials (Leadframes, Bonding Wire).
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Sumitomo Metal Mining | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.0B | $16.4B |
| Revenue | $1.8B (FY2026) | $11.0B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Packaging Materials (Leadframes, Bonding Wire) |
| Market position | niche | major |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Sumitomo Metal Mining compare
- Size: Sumitomo Metal Mining is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Sumitomo Metal Mining reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Sumitomo Metal Mining has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Sumitomo Metal Mining (Japan).