Kingboard Holdings vs Kyocera

Both are primarily Substrates companies. Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $8.0B). Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue ($13.1B vs $5.8B).

See all 105 Materials companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

Kingboard HoldingsKyocera
Market cap$8.0B$30.0B
Revenue$5.8B (FY2025)$13.1B (FY2026)
Primary segmentSubstratesSubstrates
Market positionmajormajor
CountryHong KongJapan
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers710
Chokepoint / criticality68/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Kingboard Holdings and Kyocera compare

  • Size: Kyocera is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
  • Footprint: Kingboard Holdings (Hong Kong) vs Kyocera (Japan).

Company hubs

Kingboard Holdings · Kyocera · Materials segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Kingboard Holdings vs Kyocera”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/kingboard-vs-kyocera (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Kingboard Holdings bigger than Kyocera?
Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $8.0B).
What's the difference between Kingboard Holdings and Kyocera?
Kingboard Holdings is a major in Substrates based in Hong Kong; Kyocera is a major in Substrates based in Japan. Both operate in the Materials segment.
Who are Kingboard Holdings's and Kyocera's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Kingboard Holdings and 0 for Kyocera.