IQE vs Tokuyama
Both are primarily Silicon Wafers companies. Tokuyama has a tracked market cap of $1.9B; IQE is currently unpriced in the dataset. Tokuyama reports higher tracked revenue ($2.2B vs $129M).
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| IQE | Tokuyama | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Unpriced | $1.9B |
| Revenue | $129M (FY2025) | $2.2B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Silicon Wafers | Silicon Wafers |
| Market position | leader | major |
| Country | United Kingdom | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 1 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 11 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 81/100 | 70/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How IQE and Tokuyama compare
- Revenue: Tokuyama reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: IQE has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 70/100).
- Footprint: IQE (United Kingdom) vs Tokuyama (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “IQE vs Tokuyama”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/iqe-vs-tokuyama (data as of 2026-10-09).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is IQE bigger than Tokuyama?
- By tracked revenue, Tokuyama is larger ($2.2B vs $129M).
- What's the difference between IQE and Tokuyama?
- IQE is a leader in Silicon Wafers based in United Kingdom; Tokuyama is a major in Silicon Wafers based in Japan. Both operate in the Materials segment.
- Who are IQE's and Tokuyama's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 1 suppliers for IQE and 0 for Tokuyama.