Ebara vs Ferrotec
Ebara is larger by market cap ($16.4B vs $3.0B). Ebara reports higher tracked revenue ($2.6B vs $1.8B). Ebara's primary segment is CMP & Planarization; Ferrotec's is Sputtering Targets.
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ebara | Ferrotec | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $16.4B | $3.0B |
| Revenue | $2.6B (FY2025) | $1.8B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | CMP & Planarization | Sputtering Targets |
| Market position | major | niche |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 2 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 13 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 70/100 | 53/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ebara and Ferrotec compare
- Size: Ebara is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Ebara reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ebara has the higher chokepoint score (70/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ebara (Japan) vs Ferrotec (Japan).