Ebara vs Ferrotec
Ebara's primary segment is CMP & Planarization; Ferrotec's is Sputtering Targets. Ebara is larger by market cap ($13.8B vs $3.9B). Ebara reports higher tracked revenue ($2.7B vs $1.8B).
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| Ebara | Ferrotec | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $13.8B | $3.9B |
| Revenue | $2.7B (FY2025) | $1.8B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | CMP & Planarization | Sputtering Targets |
| Market position | major | niche |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 2 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 13 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 70/100 | 53/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ebara and Ferrotec compare
- Size: Ebara is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Ebara reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ebara has the higher chokepoint score (70/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ebara (Japan) vs Ferrotec (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Ebara vs Ferrotec”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ebara-vs-ferrotec (data as of 2026-10-09).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is Ebara bigger than Ferrotec?
- Ebara is larger by market cap ($13.8B vs $3.9B).
- What's the difference between Ebara and Ferrotec?
- Ebara is a major in CMP & Planarization based in Japan; Ferrotec is a niche in Sputtering Targets based in Japan. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
- Who are Ebara's and Ferrotec's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Ebara and 2 for Ferrotec; Ferrotec's include Heraeus, Tosoh.