AT&S vs Nan Ya PCB

Both are primarily Substrates companies. Nan Ya PCB is larger by market cap ($29.9B vs $9.3B). AT&S reports higher tracked revenue ($2.0B vs $1.3B).

See all 105 Materials companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

AT&SNan Ya PCB
Market cap$9.3B$29.9B
Revenue$2.0B (FY2026)$1.3B (FY2025)
Primary segmentSubstratesSubstrates
Market positionmajormajor
CountryAustriaTaiwan
Tracked suppliers01
Tracked customers89
Chokepoint / criticality68/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How AT&S and Nan Ya PCB compare

  • Size: Nan Ya PCB is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: AT&S reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
  • Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Nan Ya PCB (Taiwan).

Company hubs

AT&S · Nan Ya PCB · Materials segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Nan Ya PCB”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-nanya_pcb (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is AT&S bigger than Nan Ya PCB?
Nan Ya PCB is larger by market cap ($29.9B vs $9.3B).
What's the difference between AT&S and Nan Ya PCB?
AT&S is a major in Substrates based in Austria; Nan Ya PCB is a major in Substrates based in Taiwan. Both operate in the Materials segment.
Who are AT&S's and Nan Ya PCB's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for AT&S and 1 for Nan Ya PCB.