AT&S vs Kyocera
Both are primarily Substrates companies. Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $9.3B). Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue ($13.1B vs $2.0B).
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| AT&S | Kyocera | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $9.3B | $30.0B |
| Revenue | $2.0B (FY2026) | $13.1B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Austria | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How AT&S and Kyocera compare
- Size: Kyocera is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Kyocera reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
- Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Kyocera (Japan).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Kyocera”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-kyocera (data as of 2026-10-09).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is AT&S bigger than Kyocera?
- Kyocera is larger by market cap ($30.0B vs $9.3B).
- What's the difference between AT&S and Kyocera?
- AT&S is a major in Substrates based in Austria; Kyocera is a major in Substrates based in Japan. Both operate in the Materials segment.
- Who are AT&S's and Kyocera's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for AT&S and 0 for Kyocera.