AT&S vs Kingboard Holdings

Both are primarily Substrates companies. AT&S is larger by market cap ($9.3B vs $8.0B). Kingboard Holdings reports higher tracked revenue ($5.8B vs $2.0B).

See all 105 Materials companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

AT&SKingboard Holdings
Market cap$9.3B$8.0B
Revenue$2.0B (FY2026)$5.8B (FY2025)
Primary segmentSubstratesSubstrates
Market positionmajormajor
CountryAustriaHong Kong
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers87
Chokepoint / criticality68/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How AT&S and Kingboard Holdings compare

  • Size: AT&S is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Kingboard Holdings reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (68/100).
  • Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Kingboard Holdings (Hong Kong).

Company hubs

AT&S · Kingboard Holdings · Materials segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Kingboard Holdings”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-kingboard (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is AT&S bigger than Kingboard Holdings?
AT&S is larger by market cap ($9.3B vs $8.0B).
What's the difference between AT&S and Kingboard Holdings?
AT&S is a major in Substrates based in Austria; Kingboard Holdings is a major in Substrates based in Hong Kong. Both operate in the Materials segment.
Who are AT&S's and Kingboard Holdings's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for AT&S and 0 for Kingboard Holdings.