AT&S vs Daeduck Electronics

Both are primarily Substrates companies. AT&S is larger by market cap ($9.3B vs $6.1B). AT&S reports higher tracked revenue ($2.0B vs $794M).

See all 105 Materials companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

AT&SDaeduck Electronics
Market cap$9.3B$6.1B
Revenue$2.0B (FY2026)$794M (FY2025)
Primary segmentSubstratesSubstrates
Market positionmajorniche
CountryAustriaSouth Korea
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers87
Chokepoint / criticality68/10050/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How AT&S and Daeduck Electronics compare

  • Size: AT&S is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: AT&S reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: AT&S has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Daeduck Electronics (South Korea).

Company hubs

AT&S · Daeduck Electronics · Materials segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “AT&S vs Daeduck Electronics”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ats-vs-daeduck (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is AT&S bigger than Daeduck Electronics?
AT&S is larger by market cap ($9.3B vs $6.1B).
What's the difference between AT&S and Daeduck Electronics?
AT&S is a major in Substrates based in Austria; Daeduck Electronics is a niche in Substrates based in South Korea. Both operate in the Materials segment.
Who are AT&S's and Daeduck Electronics's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for AT&S and 0 for Daeduck Electronics.