Meta Platforms supply chain risk

As of 2026-10-09, Meta Platforms depends on 77 tracked suppliers headquartered in 14 countries (40 of them in the United States). 17 of those suppliers hold a monopoly or leader position in their own segment, led by NVIDIA, TSMC and Broadcom. The dataset records no companies downstream of Meta Platforms: it sits at the demand end of the chain, so the risk here runs upstream only.

Data as of 2026-10-09 · suppliers are the curated key_supplier edges in the wafergraph dataset (researched or segment-inferred — see /methodology) · criticality is the graph-derived chokepoint score, 0–100

Dominant and single-source suppliers

  • NVIDIA — leader in GPU & AI Accelerators, United States criticality 81/100
  • TSMC — leader in Pure-Play Foundry, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Broadcom — leader in Networking Silicon, United States criticality 81/100
  • Dell Technologies — leader in Networking & Systems, United States criticality 81/100
  • Arista Networks — leader in Networking & Systems, United States criticality 9/100
  • Schneider Electric — leader in Power & Cooling, France criticality 91/100
  • Delta Electronics — leader in Power & Cooling, Taiwan criticality 91/100
  • Corning Incorporated — leader in Photonics & Optics, United States criticality 1/100
  • Hon Hai (Foxconn) — leader in Systems & ODM (AI servers), Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Equinix — leader in Data Center REITs, United States criticality 81/100
  • Vertiv — leader in Power & Cooling, United States criticality 91/100
  • Digital Realty — leader in Data Center REITs, United States criticality 81/100
  • CoreWeave — leader in GPU Clouds (Neoclouds), United States criticality 81/100
  • Quanta Computer — leader in Systems & ODM (AI servers), Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Accton Technology Corporation — leader in Networking & Systems, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • ASPEED Technology — leader in Edge & IoT SoC, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • ASE Technology — leader in Outsourced Assembly & Test, Taiwan criticality 81/100

A monopoly or leader supplier is the hardest to replace. These are the edges to watch first.

Suppliers by country

  • United States — 40 suppliers (52%)
  • Taiwan — 13 suppliers (17%)
  • China — 6 suppliers (8%)
  • United Kingdom — 4 suppliers (5%)
  • Australia — 3 suppliers (4%)
  • Canada — 2 suppliers (3%)
  • Singapore — 2 suppliers (3%)
  • France — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Ireland — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Japan — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Hong Kong — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Sweden — 1 supplier (1%)
  • India — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Denmark — 1 supplier (1%)

All 77 tracked suppliers

Downstream exposure

  • Criticality score: 0/100
  • Companies downstream of Meta Platforms: 0
Frequently asked questions3
How many suppliers does Meta Platforms have?
wafergraph tracks 77 key suppliers for Meta Platforms, across 14 countries.
Which of Meta Platforms's suppliers are single-source risks?
NVIDIA, TSMC, Broadcom, Dell Technologies and Arista Networks hold monopoly or leader positions in their segments, which makes them the hardest suppliers for Meta Platforms to replace.
What is Meta Platforms's supply-chain criticality score?
Meta Platforms scores 0/100 on wafergraph's chokepoint criticality index, with 0 tracked companies downstream.

Cite as: wafergraph, “Meta Platforms supply chain risk — 77 suppliers, single-source exposure & criticality”, https://wafergraph.com/supply-chain-risk/meta (data as of 2026-10-09).

Open Meta Platforms's supplier graph →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly