SkyWater Technology vs SMIC

Both are primarily Pure-Play Foundry companies. SMIC is larger by market cap ($62.9B vs $1.6B). SMIC reports higher tracked revenue ($9.3B vs $442M).

See all 17 Foundry companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

SkyWater TechnologySMIC
Market cap$1.6B$62.9B
Revenue$442M (FY2025)$9.3B (FY2025)
Primary segmentPure-Play FoundryPure-Play Foundry
Market positionnichemajor
CountryUnited StatesChina
Tracked suppliers8168
Tracked customers637
Chokepoint / criticality50/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How SkyWater Technology and SMIC compare

  • Size: SMIC is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: SMIC reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: SMIC has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: SkyWater Technology (United States) vs SMIC (China).

Company hubs

SkyWater Technology · SMIC · Foundry segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “SkyWater Technology vs SMIC”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/skywater-vs-smic (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is SkyWater Technology bigger than SMIC?
SMIC is larger by market cap ($62.9B vs $1.6B).
What's the difference between SkyWater Technology and SMIC?
SkyWater Technology is a niche in Pure-Play Foundry based in United States; SMIC is a major in Pure-Play Foundry based in China. Both operate in the Foundry segment.
Who are SkyWater Technology's and SMIC's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 8 suppliers for SkyWater Technology and 168 for SMIC — SkyWater Technology's include Shin-Etsu Chemical, FUJIFILM, DuPont; SMIC's include Shin-Etsu Chemical, SUMCO, GlobalWafers.