Pure Storage vs ZTE
Both are primarily Networking & Systems companies. Pure Storage is larger by market cap ($22.4B vs $20.8B).
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| Pure Storage | ZTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $22.4B | $20.8B |
| Revenue | — | $20.0B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Networking & Systems | Networking & Systems |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | United States | China |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 7 |
| Tracked customers | 1 | 0 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 1/100 | 0/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Pure Storage and ZTE compare
- Size: Pure Storage is the larger company by market cap.
- Supply-chain criticality: Pure Storage has the higher chokepoint score (1/100 vs 0/100).
- Footprint: Pure Storage (United States) vs ZTE (China).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Pure Storage vs ZTE”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/pure_storage-vs-zte (data as of 2026-10-09).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is Pure Storage bigger than ZTE?
- Pure Storage is larger by market cap ($22.4B vs $20.8B).
- What's the difference between Pure Storage and ZTE?
- Pure Storage is a major in Networking & Systems based in United States; ZTE is a major in Networking & Systems based in China. Both operate in the AI & Data Center segment.
- Who are Pure Storage's and ZTE's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 2 suppliers for Pure Storage and 7 for ZTE; ZTE's include Goodix Technology, Allwinner Technology.