Kioxia Holdings vs SanDisk
SanDisk reports higher tracked revenue ($7.4B vs $627M). Both are primarily NAND companies.
Shared segment: Memory.
Side-by-side
| Kioxia Holdings | SanDisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Unpriced | Unpriced |
| Revenue | $627M (FY2026) | $7.4B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | NAND | NAND |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Tracked suppliers | 4 | 2 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 6 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kioxia Holdings and SanDisk compare
- Revenue: SanDisk reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Kioxia Holdings has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Kioxia Holdings (Japan) vs SanDisk (United States).